I liked Maus a lot. I thought the author was very creative in that he took such a serious and touchy subject and turned it into a comic, something that is usually looked upon as light and for entertainment purposes. When first given the assignment to read the book, I did not think it was going to be an interesting read, for in my mind, comics and serious history just don’t mix. What a pleasant surprise I had. A story in a graphic form, readers would tend to take it in as a story, as they would a Spiderman comic or Calvin and Hobbes (one of my personal favorites). That, in itself, can be a big plus, or a minus, depending on the reader and perspective. A comic would definitely appeal to a wider range of readers, because of its simplicity and pictures, and we all know that most people prefer pictures to words. Even young teenage boys and girls would have the opportunity to pick up the book and read it, as a book about the nazis which are usually thick and wordy, would never even have caught their attention. Besides its obvious appeal, having a story about the nazis written in a graphic form takes away all touchiness from the subject. Readers would not get offended or anything of that sort because Art Spiegelman is only telling his father’s story in a fun way, including little bits and parts about his mother, not a history lesson. Maus in a graphic format makes it a lighter read, therefore appealing to a wider range of readers.
Maus being a light read, however, can also be a big minus. Given that the subject of the nazis is always a heavy and touchy subject, making it a light read gives the impression of unimportance. Because Maus is so storylike, readers would probably only remember how Anja killed herself, or the ongoing friction between Mala and Vladek. Artie’s father’s story would seem like a background, much like the many stories of their youth that grandfathers like to tell to their grandkids. I do remember the story, however, and therefore I think that if history book writers wrote like Art, I would have loved History in school so much better, the way I like it when my father tells me stories from the history books rather than reading it myself.
I really liked how Art used animals in telling the story. Although it was rather confusing in the beginning, since the character’s faces were all the same, I slowly began to see how Art used different styles of drawing to convey emotions the mood in certain scenes. I particularly liked Art’s representation of the Germans, Jews, and Poles as Cat, Mouse, and Pig. The characters are symbolic in that the Jews as mice are the at the mercy of the Germans as cats, and no matter what they do, mice simply cannot defeat cats, and therefore, all they can do is hide or run. I have personally seen cats attack birds and mice just for the fun of it, and then leave their dead bodies when they are no longer struggling. I think this represents the Nazis very well, how Art’s father tells of the gestapo who shoot Jews for the fun of it. However, one panel towards the end of the book stood out to me the most. It is the part when Vladek finally convinces Anja to leave for Hungary, and it turns out that the smugglers themselves were working for the nazis, and turned them in on the way. The panel shows the gestapo taking off Vladek’s pig face mask. With just a single panel, the intensity of the situation is immediately clear – how Vladek was trying to disguise himself as a Pole, and with the mask off, his true identity was now known and that it was doom for Vladek and Anja. Morover, the jagged edges to the panel made the situation seem more intense and urgent. In one small picture, so much is written that would probably span a few pages if put into words. Through this, we see the truth behind the saying A picture paints a thousand words.